Is Bill Clinton a victim of Feminism,Women's Rights and the Women's Liberation Witchcraft? Yes, he sure is!!!!! On July, 28, 1998 Monica Lewd-inski dropped a bomb. Monica Lewd-inski is one of several women who confessed on national television that they had extramarital so-called con"sensual" sex with President Bill Clinton; not only while he was in public office, but also literally inside his Presidential office! After months of heresy and "he say-she say" gossip and rumor, on July 28, 1998 Monica Lewd-inski decided to "spill the beans" and confess, under legal oath, in exchange for immunity from prosecution, that she had an ongoing extramarital affair with President Bill Clinton, while he was the President of the United States of America. And that some of the sexual episodes and escapades actually occurred inside the White House itself!! In fact, the President's own Secret Service body guards have also been ordered to confess under legal oath. The chief of Clinton's Secret Service was Black. The secrets of Clinton's life the Secret Service was supposed to "keep secret", must now be revealed. (Talk about caught with your "pants down...") This revelation ends month of speculation about exactly what the nature of Monica's relationship with Bill Clinton was. Monica has confessed; but what will Clinton say once he has his "day in court"? This story is classic Jerry Springer type "he say-she say". Was Monica Lewd-inski "the 'girl' who cried wolf"? To make matters worse, two days later, to further substantiate her claim, Monica Lewd-inski said that she had a dress with Bill Clinton's alleged sperm stains on it! A dress that she has kept, and had not washed in five years!!! This dress was turned over to the FBI for chemical tests. This entire episode has been very embarrassing for Americans in general, President Clinton and his family in particular, and White men and white Feminists especially. There is much prophetic symbolism in this epic scandal. What makes this such a dramatic, epic issue is that Clinton himself declared on national television once the scandal blew up in international, highly competitive, tabloid media that: "...I did not have sexual relations with that woman...". Yet there is much evidence that they had on ongoing relationship that was not "strictly business", but personal and intimate. Evidence such as a video of them hugging in public which was seen nationally. This scandal comes at a time when the tabloid Jerry Springer Show is the number one daytime television show. A show which dramatizes sexual perversion and violence every day; and then rerun every night. So, it is no coincidence that this perversion which pervades every nook and cranny, crack and crevice of American society, has now spread, like a plague, all the way to the President's "first family". The American so-called nuclear family has exploded; even all the way up to the White House itself. BUT WHAT IS THE PROPHETIC SYMBOLISM OF THIS?? When this scandal first broke, Feminists were reluctant to accuse Clinton of the classic line that Feminists have always used: "sexual harassment!!!". Now after six months, we see that it is apparently Bill Clinton who is being "harassed" and men in society in general. Harassed by a bunch of lesbian, women who seemingly have no other intention other than to embarrass Clinton; and manhood in general. We are looking at a full blown "battle between the sexes" that has become a literal gender war!!! Although the white female gender should also be embarrassed themselves for their indecency (disguised as a "right to choose"), they continue as the proverbial victim "crying wolf". This shows the hypocrisy of Feminist women, and shows how God is using them to remind men of what happens when men allow women to get "out of their place". BUT WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN? The other prophetic symbolism of this epic issue is that White men get the embarrassment they deserve for giving White women more opportunities and social leverage than Black men; when it was Black men who created the equal opportunity movement during the 1960s!!! After twenty-five years, we can now see that Black men have been the last and least to benefit from the very movement they created!!!!!!!! In fact, Black men have not benefited at all, as demonstrated by the growing homelessness of Black men and the 50% female headed Black household. If white men had not pandered to Feminists, and if President Clinton's wife, Hillary Clinton herself had not been the quintessential, arch Feminist icon in the early part of the President's first term, and been a home maker, first "lady" instead... none of this would have ever happened. Because, being a Feminist conflicts with, and contradicts the very title of the President's wife: First "Lady". Because it is considered a "woman's prerogative" to act other than a lady if she "chooses". We should remember that one of the most popular quotes of Hillary Clinton during the 1992 campaign season, was that she was not "one of those stay at home and bake cookies type of women". This Feminist statement was seen as an insult to housewives and womanhood in general. Several years later, we see that Hillary Clinton had to eat those demeaning words, and probably had to eat some cookies and milk to wash it all down!! But God is not to be mocked. You will not live and brag about how you got away with mocking God, and the roles God has programmed men and women to perform. A woman's place is not out and about like some Miss. busy body, or witch flying on a broom; because there are other women who will stand in her place and take her place, and stand by the man. So now we see, the Feminists have lost face and should be embarrassed at the new generation of women who claim that they are "free and independent". We see women are at each others throats and have gone from victim to villain and back to victim again. Sounds like the cat up at tree to me... PROPHETIC COINCIDENCE? The cover of the June 29,1998 issue of TIME magazine asked: IS FEMINISM DEAD? (Apparently not for Bill Clinton, nor for black men in general).

Big Clinton is in big trouble! Is Bill Clinton a victim of Feminism? E-mail us your comments so we can post them. This is portion of a nationally televised video that shows President Bill Clinton giving a hug to Monica Lewd-inski, thereby "seemingly" substantiating the claim that they had a relationship that was not professional, but personal. This scandal has given us all a big lesson in what happens when a woman no longer knows her place and stops "acting like a lady". Feminists have been silent about the Monica Lewd-inski investigation because it is quite obvious that, instead of crying harassment, Feminists have been doing the harassing themselves. And have also taught other women how to harass men. These have been spiteful women who, although obviously had so-called "consensual relations" with Clinton, tried to claim "sexual harassment" for no apparent reason other than moral high ground. Apparently, the relations weren't consensual but "sensual", period!!! If Hillary Clinton had been "at home baking cookies" like she was supposed to, then Clinton would not have been caught with his "hands in the cookie Jar"; eating the cookies (or sweet things) some other woman baked! The contradictions are glaring. But who will throw the first stone?? None of this would have happened if Clinton had apologized for slavery when he was supposed to. This is a disgrace for the female gender. Bill Clinton's presidency endorsed every type of dysfunctional lifestyle and "anti-family value" accept the one that might have saved him: polygamy. Pharaoh is drowning in a Red Sea of scandal as America is thrashed by obvious plagues of biblical proportions. The truth is stranger than fiction.

And then, on August 17, 1998, after giving a five hour testimony to a federal grand jury earlier in the day, President Bill Clinton then gave a national television speech, which lasted 4 minutes, and included the following quote:
PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON	"Indeed, I did have a relationship with Ms. Lewinsky that was not appropriate. In fact, it was wrong. It constituted a critical lapse in judgment and a personal failure on my part for which I am solely and completely responsible."

Is Dennis "oddman" Rodman a victim of the Miss Piggy, Feminist, Witchcraft, Genderwar too? OBVIOUSLY!!!!! Instead of the frog who turns into a prince, the poor Black man is the African prince who was turned into a frog!! Dennis "oddman" Rodman, exemplifies, typifies and epitomizes how the poor Black man has been violated and molested. Dennis "oddman" is the walking, talking, living proof of an ongoing gender war conspiracy to sissyfy and effeminize Black men. Dennis "oddman" himself, admits that his "odd" behavior of dressing like a woman is because he grew up in a "female headed household" and was ridiculed by these women for being a man. In fact, Dennis Rodman admits this himself in his very popular book: Bad As I Wanna Be. (He is indeed a "wanna be". But he want's to be the wrong thing!!) In the on going "Feminists gender war", Dennis "oddman" symbolizes how the poor Black man has been "taken hostage" by the "female gender" in the ongoing 25 year old "battle between the sexes", first instigated by Feminists in the 1970s. It is therefore no wonder, and no coincidence, that Black men are beginning to look more like the single mothers who raised them!!!! The creation of a unisex, androgynous culture is the intention of the Feminist philosophy, and they are using Black men to achieve it by showing them in the media with earrings, nose rings, pony tails and barrettes. So we can now see that there is an attempt to disgrace masculine manhood and feminine ladyhood values. The first thing Feminists have done is disgraced the idea of women "acting like a lady". Feminists seek to prove that "men are dogs" by claiming sexual harassment at every opportunity; even when the relationship is so-called con"sensual". This is why Bill Clinton is a victim of the same Witchcraft that first destroyed Black men by making them villains. White women have been accusing Black men of "harassment" from Emmit Till's accuser, to Susan Smith, who murdered her children and accused a fictional Black man. And don't forget the white man in Boston who shot and killed his pregnant wife and then said two Black man did it. He eventually confessed and killed himself. If Black men knew what this meant, he would get those earrings out of his ears. The people in Africa wear earrings for traditional, ceremonies and rituals. Black men in America wear earrings because Black women tell him: "it looks cute". The last thing we need is vain men walking around with a Miss Piggy, Miss Thang' attitude. The entire ongoing issue in the 1990s has been so-called male/female relationships and the breakdown of the so-called "dysfunctional American family". But no one wants to admit that Feminists are to blame for all this. Because, after all, "boys are not supposed to hurt girls feelings". (But do Feminists have feelings??????) Cookies & milk are to a witch what garlic & a crucifix is to a vampire!

Dennis: A menace to society and "Bad" as he wants to be; literally. But don't you see the conspiracy to turn this Black slave into a picannie sissy? Dennis says he's bad as he wants to be, but who turned him out and into a drag queen sissy, and A Jerry Springer wanna be? Yeah Dennis, you as bad as you wanna be. Awful bad!! Dennis "Oddman" dressed like a so-called Drag "Queen" instead of an African "King" like he should be.   Dennis "oddman" marries himself in a highly publicized wedding: This is classic "stuck on on your self" narcissism which is so typical of Women's Liberation theology.

BEAUTY OR A BEAST??

Just like Dennis "Oddman". Miss Piggy was a "stuck on herself" Feminist narcissist too. This is because she is the only one who thinks she's beautiful. And also because Feminism teaches women to be narcissistic and hedonistic. This is so corporate America can make billions of dollars from women. For example, consider the Virgina Slims women's cigarette slogan: IT'S A WOMAN THANG'!!! This slogan was stolen from the popular 1997 term: "It's a Black Thang".

There is a "Jerry Springer" type gender war going on in this country; and this is typified by the now infamous and historic Clinton v.s. Monica Lewd-inski sex scandal of 1998. The white woman's Feminism movement first destroyed the Black man and his so-called patriarchal family (a family where a man is at the head) by shredding him into pieces the same way the Witches army shredded the Scarecrow to pieces in the Wizard of Oz movie. Now Feminism plague has spread to destroy or "male bash" the white man himself. Feminism of the 1970s was a literal bloodless coup; and castrated the Black man's gender the same way the KKK used to physically castrate the Black man during the early 1900s. So now race pride is seen as "politically incorrect" and impolite, but we are not considered politically "incorrect" to profess, gender pride instead. If these are the new rules, then we will go by these rules and have a "gender pride" movement for Black men. The so-called "battle between the sexes" has become a full blown war! We must hurry before the rules change again.

BACK TO CONTENTS PART ONE

CLICK HERE TO WRITE US SOME EMAIL!!!